This type of places individually prosecute prostitutes/sex workers, exactly who going an offense

This 1999 rules had two significant wants: reducing prostitution (in the short term by the policing it and in the newest a lot of time name because of the switching social thinking to your they) and you can cutting individual trafficking to have sexual purposes (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017)

A second categorization scheme distinguishes among criminalization, legalization (or regulation), and decriminalization. The first category can be divided into “criminalization of the client” and “criminalization of the seller” (Ostergen, 2017). A third typology, with four categories, comes from Garotalo Geymonat (2014): criminalization (or prohibition), regulation (or legalization), abolitionism, and decriminalization. With criminalization, a state completely outlaws the exchange of sex for money. Criminalization may apply to workers or to clients, as in Sweden. With regulation, the state recognizes prostitution/sex work (only among adults and without any restrictions) and regulates the sexual activities. With abolitionism, prostitution/sex work is not illegal per se, but certain activities are declared illegal and banned, such as trafficking and third- party gain (as in brothels and pimping). Decriminalization, the newest category, has been occurring only since 2003, when New Zealand became the first country to adopt this policy. In New Zealand there is no specific law on sex work, and selling sex and sexual services is equal to any other economic activity. Danna (2014) has suggested two additional categories: neo-prohibi- tionism (the criminalization of the client) and neo-regulationism (non-punitive toward sellers).

The Swedish Sex Purchase Act was first presented as part of the Womens Peace Bill. Its purpose was “to combat prostitution, which was seen as harmful, both for those directly involved and for society at large” (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017, p. 83). To accomplish these goals, the law criminalized the clients ot prostitutes (as we know, the law does not use the term sex professionals). These clients, who commit a criminal offence, are punished with a fine and in theory even with prison (in 2011, the prison sentence increased from 6 months to 12 months), but only 200 cases are reported each year, and of these only 10% end in a fine or imprisonment (Garofalo Geymonat, 2014). Nonetheless, many other countries, including Norway, Iceland, France, and Ireland, have adopted the “Swedish model.”

Considering Jonsson and you may Jakobsson (2017), there is certainly a higher rate out-of social acceptance for experts- titution/sex are employed in regions where prostitution/sex job is legal and you can/otherwise regulated compared to places where it’s unlawful otherwise criminalized

20 years later, we are able to inquire: Did the Swedish Sex Pick Act achieve its requirements? According to Holmstrom and you will Skilbrei (2017), it is rather tough to dictate the effects, or no, of your own Swedish rules inside the Sweden. Very first, let us have a look at the brand new law’s first objective: the fresh reduced amount of prostitution. According to Kotsadam and you can Jakobsson (2014), prostitution is far more prominent in which it’s courtroom (as with Denmark) much less prominent where it is illegal (as with Sweden). not, “visibility” usually identifies highway prostitution. Given that 1999, the number of feminine (and you may men) whom sell sex in the pub from inside the Sweden have decreased rather, investigate this site but it’s nearly impossible to express the same in the online prostitution. The newest law’s 2nd goal would be to alter society’s views towards prostitution.

For this reason, we are able to conclude that “the new Sex Get Operate possess led to increased support in the [Swedish] inhabitants to own forbidding just to buy sex but also selling sexual services” (Svedin, Jonsson, Kjellgren, Priebe, Akerman, 2012, p. 33). To put it differently, it seems that the latest Swedish society not only highly prefers the legislation and also thinks that the laws should criminalize the brand new manufacturers. But that it belief performs up against the chief objectives of statutes, and this will include the latest sufferers (the latest sellers) also to criminalize the purchasers (Holmstrom Skilbrei, 2017).